Rachel Reeves has indicated that she’s set to scrap the two-child limit later this month in her autumn budget statement but as the founder of the campaign group Single Parent Rights, I will be concerned how far this commitment goes until I hear the announcement of a full scrapping of both the two-child limit and the benefit cap.
The choice is really quite simple: allow child poverty to grow unchecked, or lift 400,000 children out of poverty and put a stop to its seemingly never ending expansion by scrapping the two child limit and the benefit cap.
The UK is the sixth richest economy in the world, but it remains the only country to limit means-tested benefits to two children. These policies are touted as incentives to ‘get people back to work’ and yet they do no such thing. Instead, they sustain the tired, mythical image of the “single mum benefit scrounger”.
Read more:
- I’m a working mum earning a decent salary – but the two-child limit on benefits hits my family too
- After growing up in poverty, I know the anger 4.5 million children must feel
- Benefit cap puts single mothers like me at risk of homelessness and destitution
People often assume that the benefit cap only affects people who don’t work – after all, that’s how it’s framed by many politicians and much of the media. The truth is very different. Families earning up to £845 a month can still be capped meaning their social security payments are cut. For thousands of families this equates to losing out on more than £150 a week.
This includes single mothers on maternity leave who are legally barred from working. I’m not sure what’s more absurd, that the government punishes people for not working when they legally can’t work, or that policy continues to be shaped around a stereotype that doesn’t exist?