Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty
Opinion

A quarter of a billion for a footballer? Just imagine what that money could do

The money being offered for Kylian Mbappé might sound vulgar, but to Saudi Arabia it's small change

Footballer Kylian Mbappe of France and Paris St Germain has been the subject of transfer speculation

Footballer Kylian Mbappe of France reacts during the UEFA EURO 2024 qualifying round group B match between France and Greece. Image: Sebastian Frej / Alamy Stock Photo

Context is everything. Though even with context it’s sometimes a struggle to make sense of what is going on. A transfer fee of around £260 million has been offered for footballer Kylian Mbappé. Saudi team Al-Hilal have offered his current club Paris Saint-Germain the staggering sum. Whether it goes through or not, a change is here. We’re now in the era of footballers valued in increments of billions rather than millions.

History has a curious way of tapping you on the shoulder when new history is being made. The Mbappé news came in the week Trevor Francis, England’s first £1m footballer, died. It feels a long way from £1m to a quarter of a billion. Though it is only a little over 40 years. 

Of course, nobody is worth that amount, nor the staggering wages Mbappé would receive. But it has nothing to do with football. The future is tugging on Saudi Arabia’s sleeve. They see that a time will come when the world will no longer have the same reliance on oil. (Though who knows when. Will the devastating fires in Greece and Italy, the floods in Korea or the storms in the US finally accelerate positive change? Or will short-termism, as currently spoken by the two main political parties in the UK, knock things back?) 

Get the latest news and insight into how the Big Issue magazine is made by signing up for the Inside Big Issue newsletter

If/when the global need recedes, the Saudis want to diversify and for their nation to be an international hub for sport. The sovereign Public Investment Fund, the money driving this change, is estimated to total £500bn. They could get a lot of Mbappés and a lot of golfers and lucrative overpriced boxing clashes and football clubs like Newcastle United for that amount. It’s about the same as Nigeria’s GDP, and higher than Denmark’s and Finland’s. It’s a chunky sum. 

Leaving aside moral questions about the money paid for one player, or indeed the questionable human rights record in Saudi, should we be happy that because a possible alternative exists the burning of oil will fall back and so the positives for the planet will move forward? 

Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty
Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty

Last week it was revealed the ambition goes beyond sport. The fund acquired an interest in Selfridges during the recent £4bn takeover. The UK government, keen to find some kind of post-Brexit positive, have been courting sovereign wealth funds’ inward investment. The Qatari Fund, the equivalent of the Saudis, has long been mooted as part of a consortium to take over the National Grid, which belies the government’s ongoing insistence about controlling national energy supplies in light of how in thrall prices have been to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The Qataris also own PSG and are favourites to buy Manchester United. Money grows money. 

But what if the Saudis and others decided to use their almost limitless wealth as an altruistic soft power push? 

If they looked at the UK and said, we see that 130,000 children are in temporary accommodation, they’re homeless, so we’re going to throw an Mbappé amount of money at that because we believe it’s the right thing to do? Or they insist that here is a quarter of a billion heading into a central fund to smash the need for food banks in Britain. Or really break the back of social housing need and grow provision out from there. 

That could really move the dial.  

Or – OR – the actual government of this country could do these things itself, show it is serious about eradicating poverty and making life better for the growing number of people who need help, rather than, as a government, getting happily mired in confected culture war battles and relying on handouts from overseas to boost their growth plans. 

Imagine how they’d be viewed in that context. 

Paul McNamee is editor of the Big IssueRead more of his columns here. Follow him on Twitter

Do you have a story to tell or opinions to share about this? We want to hear from you. Get in touch and tell us more.

Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty

Buy a Vendor Support Kit for £36.99

Change a life this Christmas. Every kit purchased helps keep vendors earning, warm, fed and progressing.

Recommended for you

View all
What we have learned after 15 years of universal credit – and what must change
jobcentre plus/ dwp
Lucy Bannister

What we have learned after 15 years of universal credit – and what must change

There's much we can learn from Ukraine in the fight against homelessness
Nick Hardwick

There's much we can learn from Ukraine in the fight against homelessness

Universal credit flaws are driving people to food banks. It's time it covered the essentials
A Trussell food bank worker sorting food parcels
Ayaz Manji

Universal credit flaws are driving people to food banks. It's time it covered the essentials

15 years on, it's time we made universal credit the game changer it can be 
Then prime minister David Cameron and his chancellor George Osborne.
Iain Porter

15 years on, it's time we made universal credit the game changer it can be