Housing

Labour must urgently tackle land banking to have any hope of solving UK's housing crisis

If Keir Starmer wants to be a builder not a blocker, he could start by stopping building companies from buying up huge swathes of land

Image: Shutterstock

The top housebuilders have mounted a massive land grab over the last five years, taking their already sprawling land banks close to the million plots mark. 

They are buying up huge swathes of Britain cheaply with no intention of building on it anytime soon. My new analysis of the company reports of the eight leading housebuilders has found that the land they hold has soared to 918,823 plots, an increase of 49% on 2018.  

Taylor Wimpey has the biggest bank with 223,745 plots, a rise of 16.5% on 2018 and enough to last 16 years at the rate it builds. Barratt and Persimmon have both increased their land holdings by 71% to 172,174 and 168,461 plots respectively. And Bellway is no slouch: it now has 100,367 plots, a 161% increase on 2018. On average, the eight have enough land to last for more than 11 years, based on the rate they built homes in their last full trading year. At their reduced level of completions since interest rates started rising, they could keep going until around 2040 without buying another plot.  

Get the latest news and insight into how the Big Issue magazine is made by signing up for the Inside Big Issue newsletter

For the housebuilders, this makes commercial sense. As Taylor Wimpey’s annual report says: “Our strategic pipeline (of land) is a competitive advantage in its own right, giving increased optionality and opportunities to protect value.” Translated, they mean that, by having an abundance of land, they can readily turn the tap up or down when it suits them in terms of prices and profits.  

For politicians, however, this “optionality” is a nightmare. With the big eight accounting for nearly half of all private sector completions, they can make or break any attempt to tackle the housing crisis that relies primarily on their profit motive. This gives them huge leverage in policymaking and has led to both major parties pandering to their self-interested complaint that planning rules are onerous.  

Most recently, the government tried to use an amendment to its Levelling Up Bill to ditch an EU rule requiring builders to offset river pollution from their developments. Labour peers joined the Greens in voting to defeat that move in the House of Lords, but Keir Starmer has a planning ‘reform’ agenda of his own that could have even more far-reaching consequences. In a speech in May, he said Labour would be “builders not blockers” and would make the “tough choice” to allow development on green belts to achieve a target of building 300,000 homes a year. 

It seems Labour policy is now heavily influenced by the anti-planning lobby group, Centre for Cities, which published a report in February claiming that the 1947 Town and Country Planning Act is primarily to blame for restricting land for development and thus for Britain’s “four million missing homes” – without mentioning that the major housebuilders are already sitting on 11 years’ supply.

Calling for the present planning system to be replaced by US-style zoning to give developers more “certainty”, on page 53 of its report it reveals that this would mean allowing them to build 1.8 to 2.1m houses “around train stations in the green belt for suburban living”.  

This was Centre for Cities’ goal as it lobbied delegates to this year’s party conferences, and the north of England metro mayors who spoke at its events should be wary. The green belt being talked about here is the one around London. On past performance, housebuilders will happily snaffle up prime sites in the most lucrative locations and leave less profitable sites in their land banks.

There is no guarantee that urbanising green belt will generate any overall increase in completions, and it would almost certainly lead to an even greater concentration of development in the south-east. Meanwhile, anyone living in inner-city London taking a train to go for a country walk would find that, on reaching a station in the former green belt, they would have to trek through miles of suburban sprawl before reaching open woods and fields. 

So, what is the answer? Land banking could be controlled by limiting the number of plots a builder can hold to a multiple of its current annual output, with any excess being subject to compulsory purchase. Of the top eight, three – Barratt, Persimmon and Bellway – had a supply of six years or less in 2018. If a limit of six years’ supply was applied to all the builders now, they would have to either double annual completions or sell the surplus 424,390 plots to local authorities at cost. If six years’ supply was good enough for some of them before the latest land grab, why not impose it on all of them now? 

Tackling land banking is, however, only part of the solution. Experience since Thatcher tells us that it is unrealistic to expect the private sector to deliver a 300,000-plus target, regardless of how much land they have or how benign the economic circumstances are. Even in 2007, the best of the last 30 years, the housebuilders could only provide 195,870 new homes – nowhere near enough to make up for local authority completions averaging only 1,763 annually throughout those years. 

Speaking at this year’s Labour conference, Angela Rayner said the party will not let developers “wriggle out of their responsibilities” to build more ‘affordable’ housing. This may have sounded plausible to the uninitiated, but ever-increasing land banks give housebuilders the upper hand and show they will develop sites only when the profits are good. When questioned on council housing, Rayner refused to pledge any funding or to end Right To Buy.   

In the 1970s, despite the economic difficulties and public spending restraints, councils built an average of 134,231 homes annually. If that had happened over the last 30 years, the four million missing homes would now not only have been built but would be earning rent to pay for building more. 

Thatcher’s reforms were an epic act of self-harm, continued inexplicably by all her successors. We can’t undo the damage at a stroke, but it would be ludicrous to compound the mistake by persisting in relying on the private sector. If Starmer wants to be a builder not a blocker, he should tackle the real blockers who hoard land and empower local authorities to get on with building desperately needed homes. 

Steve Howell is a journalist, political commentator and author of three books, including Game Changer, an insider’s account of Labour’s 2017 general election campaign 

This article is taken from The Big Issue magazine, which exists to give homeless, long-term unemployed and marginalised people the opportunity to earn an income. To support our work buy a copy!

If you cannot reach your local vendor, you can still click HERE to subscribe to The Big Issue today. Or give a gift subscription to a friend or family member. You can also purchase one-off issues from The Big Issue Shop or The Big Issue app, available now from the App Store or Google Play

Support the Big Issue

For over 30 years, the Big Issue has been committed to ending poverty in the UK. In 2024, our work is needed more than ever. Find out how you can support the Big Issue today.
Vendor martin Hawes

Recommended for you

View all
Rents in UK are rising at highest rate in decades. Will they keep going up?
rents uk
Renting

Rents in UK are rising at highest rate in decades. Will they keep going up?

'It's an epidemic': 1.4 million workers trapped in insecure jobs are stuck in precarious rented homes
insecure work and insecure rented homes impact life decisions
Employment

'It's an epidemic': 1.4 million workers trapped in insecure jobs are stuck in precarious rented homes

It's five years and four PMs since Tory vow to ban no-fault evictions. Why are we still waiting?
Theresa May announced no-fault evictions would be scrapped
RENTING

It's five years and four PMs since Tory vow to ban no-fault evictions. Why are we still waiting?

No-fault evictions put households at risk of homelessness over 80,000 times since Tory ban pledge
Renters Reform Bill campaigners call for the end of no-fault evictions
RENTING

No-fault evictions put households at risk of homelessness over 80,000 times since Tory ban pledge

Most Popular

Read All
Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits
Renters: A mortgage lender's window advertising buy-to-let products
1.

Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal
Pound coins on a piece of paper with disability living allowancve
2.

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over
next dwp cost of living payment 2023
3.

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know
4.

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know