News

Will it cost £50bn to fix the cladding crisis?

Old news, truthfully retold. This week we delve into the debate over how much ending the cladding crisis will cost ahead of Grenfell's fourth anniversary

cladding

Illustration credit: Miles Cole

Every week in Fact/Fiction, The Big Issue examines spurious claims, questionable studies or debatable stories from the press to determine whether they are fact or fiction. This week The Big Issue looks at the debate over how much it will cost to end the cladding crisis as the fourth anniversary of the Grenfell Tower disaster approaches.

How it was told

The nation will mark the fourth anniversary of the Grenfell Tower disaster in just a few weeks but still the row over who will pay to remove aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding shows no sign of reaching a conclusion.

The issue has been fiercely contested recently in Parliament. MPs and peers disagreed over how leaseholders will be protected during several debates over the Fire Safety Bill in the last parliamentary session.

And another fire at a London high-rise with ACM cladding, Poplar’s New Providence Wharf, put the question at the top of the news agenda once more.

But how much will it cost to help leaseholders remove the dangerous cladding? Around £50bn, according to reports in April. Construction Enquirer ran the story under the headline: “True cost of cladding crisis as high as £50bn”.

Other specialist titles PBC Today and Show House ran similar stories too.

The reports prompted a response from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, which tweeted: “There have been recent reports suggesting that our £5 billion investment in remediating unsafe buildings will only cover 10% of the total cost. This figure is unsubstantiated and the reports are unreliable and unhelpful.”

But what is the truth?

Facts. Checked

The fact is that the £50bn figure is an estimate and cannot be conclusively verified, but the government’s failure to show its own working on how it arrived at the £5bn figure means it cannot be trusted either.

Where does the £50bn figure come from? It is an estimate from East Midlands contractor Colmore Tang Construction.

The firm used prices for remedial projects on more than 20 typical developments in Leeds, Liverpool and Manchester to come up with the estimate. It found works cost around £4.65m for buildings above 18 metres in height and £2m for jobs between 11 metres and 18 metres.

No conclusive survey has been carried out to determine exactly how many buildings of all heights require work to remove ACM cladding. So Colmore Tang uses government Building Safety Programme estimates of how many buildings need an EWS1 (External Wall System) certificate as well as remedial works.

This data shows 5,000 buildings over 18 metres needed the certificate, as well as 35,000 medium-sized buildings between 11 and 18 metres in height. That adds up to a cost of £25bn for the higher buildings and £70bn for the smaller ones. News reports stated that “given the paucity of information generally available and taking an optimistic view” the firm opted to halve their estimate to arrive at a £50bn figure plus VAT.

This is a rough estimate based on first-hand experience of similar work so cannot be completely relied upon, but it does give an idea of the scale of the problem. Colmore Tang are not the only ones who doubt the £5bn Building Safety Fund will be enough. Last June the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government estimated that addressing all fire safety defects in every high-risk residential building could potentially cost up to £15bn.

The committee’s report said: “If the government doesn’t provide additional funding, let us be clear: it means tens of thousands of residents sent massive bills for problems that aren’t their fault, and which, in many cases, will be a financial burden from which they will never recover.”

While the government may well have been right to criticise these stories, this was an opportunity to show its own arithmetic to clear up the debate and prevent more speculation from industry experts.

Ministers face increasing calls from leaseholders in homes with dangerous cladding to ensure they don’t foot the bill for the removal, leaving some at risk of financial ruin. A loans scheme to pay for the work on top of the fund is set to be included in the forthcoming Building Safety Bill, which was announced in the Queen’s Speech. Property developers will also be required to pick up a portion of the bill to remove the cladding.

But one thing is certain: no one must be left living in a dangerous home or pushed into homelessness by the costs of removing cladding once the crisis is over.

Worth repeating

The Grenfell Tower disaster will be four years old on June 24

72 people died in the tragedy

It not known exactly how many people lived in Grenfell Tower but it is thought 255 people escaped the blaze, according to the Metropolitan Police

Support the Big Issue

For over 30 years, the Big Issue has been committed to ending poverty in the UK. In 2024, our work is needed more than ever. Find out how you can support the Big Issue today.
Vendor martin Hawes

Recommended for you

View all
Calls to nationalise Thames Water as Brits face 40% increase in bills: 'A con and a disgrace'
Water bills

Calls to nationalise Thames Water as Brits face 40% increase in bills: 'A con and a disgrace'

Will free school meals and vouchers be offered over the Easter holidays?
Free school meals/ Easter holidays
Free school meals

Will free school meals and vouchers be offered over the Easter holidays?

Leaked letter to Tory MPs reveals renting reforms will be 'watered down' to 'appease landlords'
Renters Reform Bill
RENTING

Leaked letter to Tory MPs reveals renting reforms will be 'watered down' to 'appease landlords'

Council tax is going up for millions in April. Here's what to do if you're struggling to pay
council tax/ houses
Cost of living crisis

Council tax is going up for millions in April. Here's what to do if you're struggling to pay

Most Popular

Read All
Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits
Renters: A mortgage lender's window advertising buy-to-let products
1.

Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal
Pound coins on a piece of paper with disability living allowancve
2.

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal

Here's when UK households to start receiving last cost of living payments
next dwp cost of living payment 2023
3.

Here's when UK households to start receiving last cost of living payments

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know
4.

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know