Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty
Get 8 issues for only £9.99 - delivered to your door
SUBSCRIBE
Opinion

John Bird: All the ingredients for perfect chaos

Never in modern times have so many people believed so little in an election result that did not go their desired way

Brexit bus

Boris Johnson with Gisela Stuart in front of one of Vote Leave's battle buses

A few days ago I received a photo of the Queen walking with Daniel Craig, the current James Bond. In speech bubbles James is saying “All of Parliament, Ma’am?”, and the Queen replies “Yes 007, the damn lot of them.”

Over recent months many have felt that the House of Commons has led people to conjure up such fantasies as the above. I think I might have felt similarly angered; but is that the sensible response to a completely unprecedented chaos?

For some years now, and in these pages in particular, I have been going on about ‘Ingredientism’. Ingredientism is as simple as it sounds: what are the elements that make up something in particular? I have been looking at the ingredients that made up the First World War, trying to extract what was necessary for this calamitous event to happen. I am sure that what I call ‘ingredientism’ is called something posher in the academies of history and philosophy. But I could not from henceforth look at anything as something, as a thing in itself.

I had experimented with this in the beginning days of The Big Issue. I started describing homelessness as ‘the tip of the social iceberg’; the presenting problem. That what you saw was the homelessness of a person, but underneath it were all of the variegated elements, ingredients that made it up.

If you look at the crisis, the chaos, the inability of MPs to converge into a coherent mass behind a policy or programme, you have to realise that it was a long time coming. That like the First World War, or homelessness, dozens of things had to happen for anything to happen.

The chaos is completely predictable, but probably also avoidable. Looking back to when David Cameron led us into a referendum, absolutely convinced that he would get his ‘remain’ mandate, and could shut up his Eurosceptics, he provided many of the ingredients that make up the kerfuffle of the current House of Commons.

Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty
Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty

But he was not alone. Farage and political disdain based on Old Etonian rivalry conspired to make more ingredients. This was coupled with deep distrust of Europe among Thatcherite Tories, and a growing sense of loss among many people about Europe’s distant decision-making. Another ingredient that might also have contributed is being an island people off the main body of a continent; you could magnify the elements, the ingredients. And they all add up to the problems of current times.

Add to this a kind of Them and Us that stalked the land, and you are beginning to get the explosive cocktail that leads to chaos.

But the biggest element was that never in modern times have so many people believed so little in an election result that did not go their desired way. ‘Sore loser’ does not quite work, or explain, the deep-seated rejection of the result by the part that lost, the Remainers.

So if you have a pro-Remain Parliament, by about 70 per cent in both Houses, who voted 80 per cent for the referendum, and you end up with the wrong result, then you might get confusion and chaos en masse. If the losing side accepted the result you would not get this chaos. This would have all been done and dusted.

But because deep in their hearts the Remainers inside and outside Parliament can’t swallow the result, you have the constitutional crisis where seemingly over 600 MPs want different things; individually.

If you find yourself thinking what a bunch of nutcases have got into the Commons, bear in mind that they are living a crisis that is reflected foremost in the minds of all of those who reject the result

Most of my fellow Remainers who I know cannot accept the result. And because of that cannot accept the resultant Brexit, in whatever form it presents itself. This is a recipe for chaos. Because every major piece of government and politics in this country for over 100 years has relied on both sides accepting the result.

If you cannot accept the result then you cannot accept the process of our democracy; hence MPs can only in the end chase their own tails, seemingly. Yet what they are largely trying to do, this 70 per cent ‘remain’ Parliament, is square the circle over the referendum result.

And it’s not possible.

The biggest ingredient is the rejection of the result. That is the new thing in our Parliament. A new element: they cannot accept the result, even though they have to struggle towards a recognition of that result. If only legally.

So if you find yourself thinking what a bunch of nutcases have got into the Commons, bear in mind that they are living a crisis that is reflected foremost in the minds of all of those who reject the result. They are the living embodiment of what goes wrong when two sides can’t agree on the result of a contest once it is over.

And each Remainer MP, setting aside those who jockey for higher office, believes that they cannot just sit back and suck in that result. It is to them a catastrophic result. They cannot sit idly by and watch us untangle from what has been seen as the revitaliser of post-war Britain.

No solution presents itself. But one thing we cannot do is simply look at this and blame our MPs for not being able to converge into the old groups. These MPs are the presenting problem, manifesting a deeper issue amongst us all. We are witnessing a sea change and Parliament is likely to look very different after all this splintering.

Not many people actually wanted a war in 1914. And not many people want a revolution in 21st-century UK. Chaos has its own reality.

Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty

Never miss an issue

Take advantage of our special subscription offer. Subscribe from just £9.99 and never miss an issue.

Recommended for you

View all
People in poverty feel disconnected from democracy. But it doesn't have to be this way
Hannah Paylor

People in poverty feel disconnected from democracy. But it doesn't have to be this way

How building a healthier society will get Rachel Reeves out of a bind
chancellor Rachel Reeves ahead of the Spring Statement
Laurie Lee

How building a healthier society will get Rachel Reeves out of a bind

Social opportunity should take the place of social security 
John Bird

Social opportunity should take the place of social security 

Being diagnosed with a brain tumour was the best day of my life. Here’s how it let me help others
Timothy Samples, pictured with wife Michelle, suffered seizures, a brain injury and a brain tumour
Timothy Samples

Being diagnosed with a brain tumour was the best day of my life. Here’s how it let me help others

Most Popular

Read All
Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits
Renters: A mortgage lender's window advertising buy-to-let products
1.

Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal
Pound coins on a piece of paper with disability living allowancve
2.

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over
next dwp cost of living payment 2023
3.

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know
4.

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know

Support our vendors with a subscription

For each subscription to the magazine, we’ll provide a vendor with a reusable water bottle, making it easier for them to access cold water on hot days.