Advertisement
Become a member of the Big Issue community
JOIN
Opinion

The future of levelling up looks bleak - even Labour's plans will hold back local areas

Devolution is an important step towards levelling up, but will be held back unless the central funding system is reformed, writes Daniel Reast

Michael Gove visiting Mayfield, Greater Manchester on levelling up duties. Image: Tim Hammond/Number 10 Downing St

Boarded-up shops, tragic bus services, ailing community projects, leaking leisure centres.

These are the victims of decline in our local areas, pushed to the brink and beyond after years of cuts to public spending and the weakened finances of local government.

They were the aspects of improvement which levelling up was predicated on – renewal of local character, development and encouragement for growth.

Your support changes lives. Find out how you can help us help more people by signing up for a subscription

Three years on since this slogan beguiled the voters and its failures can’t be seen as anything but a national scandal – not least because of the legacy of its benefactor in ravaging local services through austerity. 

But as the Treasury cuts spending for new capital funding in levelling up, it reveals it too is recognising what a disaster its efforts have been.

Advertisement
Advertisement

It doesn’t inspire confidence if a government department’s purpose is being given a dressing down from the moneymen. 

Get the latest news and insight into how the Big Issue magazine is made by signing up for the Inside Big Issue newsletter

In the Levelling Up white paper, Michael Gove wrote: “People deserve to live in a country where life is not a postcode lottery.” 

In hindsight, we can safely say this vision has been wrecked by the policy’s own legacy – a competition of councils fighting for some petty cash to pay for local improvements.

Even after a change in prime minister, Liz Truss went straight back to the auction model for so-called ‘investment zones’, aimed at boosting growth and deregulation in local areas.

The investment zones policy has since collapsed with councils left wondering what the point was in even trying to secure funding.

This is one of the core weaknesses at the heart of levelling up: who pays for it and what ‘it’ actually is.

Lisa Nandy is correct to say the history of this government’s investment into local areas is pithy. But it’s unfortunate that her party isn’t offering a tangible alternative to levelling up beyond vague assertions of local empowerment and leadership.

Indeed, Labour’s foray into levelling up shows little difference to the policies offered by its rival, minus the elimination of bidding processes. 

The Department for Levelling Up has been under scrutiny from parliamentary committees on the calculations and spending of the bespoke funding pots. The evidence to suggest money has been allocated to match Conservative electoral ambitions is unsurprising but goes to the heart of levelling up’s failure – a lack of local direction.

The primary beneficiaries of levelling up are local councils, working on behalf of residents to improve public services, experiences and life outcomes. If the slogan is to continue, it should be our councils who control the money, not Whitehall.

To do this, any government wanting to actually solve decline in the regions will reform the finance system for local government to be more independent and self-directed, while still having a central sponsor to give them the tools to succeed.

For one, council tax is long-overdue for reform – an essential move if Westminster wants to reduce inequality and adequately fund public services. And yet, Croydon, Slough and Thurrock councils are giving residents a massive increase of 10 per cent to 15 per cent for poor financial administration outside of their control.

But instead of reform, both Labour and the Conservatives have devoted too much of their time to the cause of devolution without fixing core problems. Devolution to the English regions is an important step and cannot be criticised in its intentions. But more mayors, more powers and more services to deliver will be held back by a finance system which simply isn’t effective enough to drive improvements.

With new capital spending from Whitehall now ended, and a limited ability to self-fund projects, local government won’t have as many avenues for regeneration and improvements. A rational response to this would be to establish a separate investment grant delivered alongside the settlement from Whitehall, unshackled by bidding culture, for the discretion of councils to build whatever they feel is worthwhile.

This dedicated investment fund would wipe out the legacy of irritating auction house politics and enable a comforting sense of ownership in new projects.

Levelling up may be a dead slogan but its spirit for improvement will live on – it’s up for grabs if our leaders are willing to go far enough. 

Daniel Reast is a freelance journalist covering housing, local government and equalities.

Advertisement

Become a Big Issue member

3.8 million people in the UK live in extreme poverty. Turn your anger into action - become a Big Issue member and give us the power to take poverty to zero.

Recommended for you

View all
It's never been more dangerous to be a Palestinian aid worker – we feel the world has abandoned us
Salma Altaweel

It's never been more dangerous to be a Palestinian aid worker – we feel the world has abandoned us

I spy a new John Le Carré novel – well, almost
Paul McNamee

I spy a new John Le Carré novel – well, almost

Starmer and Streeting have talked the talk on mental health support – now they must walk the walk
Labour minister for health, Wes Streeting
Oliver Chantler

Starmer and Streeting have talked the talk on mental health support – now they must walk the walk

Reasons for keeping two-child benefit cap are thin at best and cruel at worst – Labour must lift it
Adult holding a child's hand in front of a pond. child poverty
Vikki Brownridge

Reasons for keeping two-child benefit cap are thin at best and cruel at worst – Labour must lift it

Most Popular

Read All
Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits
Renters: A mortgage lender's window advertising buy-to-let products
1.

Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal
Pound coins on a piece of paper with disability living allowancve
2.

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over
next dwp cost of living payment 2023
3.

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know
4.

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know