Opinion

The time for a Covid inquiry is now, before more failures cost more lives

What could have been done is not a question for historians, writes Paul Mason. Actions should have consequences, and we need answers now.

Boris Johnson stands at a podium with government warnings, with his head bowed

In May 2020 Boris Johnson instructued the UK to "to stay at home in order to protect the NHS and save lives." Image: Pippa Fowles / No 10 Downing Street.

Britain has one of the highest Covid death rates in the world. Why? It’s a simple and urgent question. Because, despite the rapid roll out of a vaccine, as I write this more than a thousand people a day are dying from the virus.

At the start of the pandemic chief scientific adviser Patrick Vallance said 20,000 dead would be a “good outcome”. By last week, five times that number had perished. But according to the vaccines minister Nadhim Zahawi, we’ll have to wait for an explanation. He told the BBC that “an inquiry will answer these questions… once we have got our lives back and the economy back”.

Meanwhile, faced with Keir Starmer’s calls for more decisive action, Boris Johnson repeatedly falls back on the “Captain Hindsight” jibe. None of this was foreseeable and questions about what went wrong are for later, goes the argument.

This is a blame shifting strategy — not just politically dishonest but dangerous. The danger remains of new mutations, a fourth wave and a “new abnormal” in which we may face a rolling vaccination programme and the semi-permanent blight on schools, universities, the entertainment, transport and hospitality industries.

So the time for answers is now. What could have been done but was rejected or failed — and why — are not questions for the historians to answer. They should be obsessing the policymakers.

Lockdowns have taken income away from hundreds of Big Issue sellers. Support The Big Issue and our vendors by signing up for a subscription.

Let’s list the obvious failures. The first was a failure of vision. On 3 February, Boris Johnson told diplomats Britain wasn’t going to let the coronavirus stand in the way of its drive to open up global trade. Within weeks, governments were impounding PPE stocks on airport runways and global trade had collapsed.

According to a Sunday Times investigation, for five weeks the Government “sleepwalked into disaster”. Crucially it briefed journalists that it would follow a “herd immunity” strategy, letting the virus rip through the population until enough people had acquired immunity.

That’s might be appropriate for influenza, but scientists in China were already warning that this was a disease more like SARS, and calling for lockdowns and travel bans. Herd immunity was quickly abandoned, and the Government denies ever following it. But the damage was done.

Then came a series of quantifiable screw-ups. The PPE shortage was a product of fragile supply chains and de-prioritised pandemic plans. The test-and-trace fiasco saw public health systems bypassed in order to create a hugely expensive privatised system that, in the first wave, did not work.

Johnson’s political philosophy tells him to err on the side of doing as little as possible, until the last moment

The decision to shunt the pandemic into the elderly care home sector — by transferring 25,000 untested patients from hospital and advising that PPE was not essential — was clear and, according to Amnesty International, a violation of the human rights of tens of thousands of people.

Meanwhile, according to one study, the failure to impose flight restrictions allowed 190,000 people to enter Britain from Wuhan and other affected Chinese cities, in the first three months of 2020.

And then, from mid-September, as the second and more deadly wave took off, the whole story of reluctance and delay was repeated, only now at bigger scale.

On 21 September SAGE advised Johnson that, with 90 per cent of the population still at risk from the virus, “not acting now to reduce cases will result in a very large epidemic with catastrophic consequences in terms of direct Covid-related deaths and the ability of the health service to meet needs”.

SAGE called for a circuit-breaker lockdown  and another shutdown of bars, restaurants and hairdressers. The advice was rejected and the second wave took off.

Only on October 31 was the Government bounced into a new, four-week lockdown. It slackened the lockdown on December 2 and encouraged people to prepare to spend Christmas with their families, only to reverse the policy at the last moment. By 16 December, cases per day had hit 35,000 – already above the second-wave peak.

If these were a series of unconnected accidents you could wait for answers. But they are linked by a golden threat: it’s called conservatism. Conservatives expect the market, not the state, to solve most problems and want government by inclination to intervene as little as possible into the economy and people’s lives.

Whenever Boris Johnson reads scientific advice, he also has, in his ear, columnists from the Spectator and hosts from TalkRadio telling him to ignore it. The arbiter is the political philosophy in his head, which tells him to err on the side of doing as little as possible, until the last moment.

Only in January 2021 did we finally get what, according to Home Secretary Priti Patel, she called for last March: a serious shutdown of international travel links and mandatory quarantine.

But this is not down to one person. Our entire public health system has failed. If you think the word failure too strong, look at the rock concerts being staged in New Zealand, or the buzzing nightlife in South Korea and Taiwan, or Australia’s beaches – back to life in the Aussie summer because they took decisive action in 2020.

Actions should have consequences, and if the efforts of doctors, nurses and vaccinators bring relief from the current wave by the school half term, that’s when a public inquiry into the Covid fiasco should start. This government is more than capable of inflicting failure after failure, way into the future, because it will not learn.

Support the Big Issue

For over 30 years, the Big Issue has been committed to ending poverty in the UK. In 2024, our work is needed more than ever. Find out how you can support the Big Issue today.
Vendor martin Hawes

Recommended for you

View all
Voyager 1's galactic mixtape, extending a hand of welcome to the universe 
Paul McNamee

Voyager 1's galactic mixtape, extending a hand of welcome to the universe 

DWP has the power to help people. Why is it choosing to threaten disabled people instead?
dwp
Sumi Rabindrakumar

DWP has the power to help people. Why is it choosing to threaten disabled people instead?

In praise of the wonderfully refreshing Taskmaster contestant Sophie Willian
NIck Mohammed, Sophie Willan and Steve Pemberton on S17 of Taskmaster
Lucy Sweet

In praise of the wonderfully refreshing Taskmaster contestant Sophie Willian

Has the two-child benefit cap put 'fairness' before children's best interests?
Louise Bazalgette

Has the two-child benefit cap put 'fairness' before children's best interests?

Most Popular

Read All
Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits
Renters: A mortgage lender's window advertising buy-to-let products
1.

Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal
Pound coins on a piece of paper with disability living allowancve
2.

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over
next dwp cost of living payment 2023
3.

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know
4.

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know