The 50th anniversary of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act (1977) in a couple of years’ time will be an opportunity to reflect on groundbreaking legislation, which for the first time gave local authorities a general duty to house people who are homeless. With equivalent laws in Scotland and Northern Ireland, it provides a safety net for people in the UK who are homeless – or more accurately – a safety net for some.
Approaching the anniversary, one element we believe requires urgent revision to address rising homelessness is known as priority need. Put simply, it means some people do not receive help to find a home. Thankfully, there is hope that Wales might soon follow Scotland in abolishing this outdated measure, placing additional pressure on the UK government to take similar action.
Read more:
- We need a fundamental reset of our broken homelessness system. Here’s what Labour must do
- Young LGBTQ+ people are made homeless because of who they are – but official stats don’t show it
- London homelessness centre forced to turn young people away due to ‘unprecedented demand’
From the beginning, to manage demand, the housing duty in the 1977 act had limitations. For example, even if a person meets all other requirements, councils only have to house those who fit into one of a number of categories – such as someone who is pregnant or living with children, or someone vulnerable for a number of specified reasons whom the law considers to be in priority need. Councils are not required to find a permanent home for people who do not fall into one of these or certain other categories, whatever their other needs might be.
In England, the priority need restriction is still firmly in place. As homelessness has risen over time, The Salvation Army has seen the harm that it has done, making it hard for some groups of people – such as, but far from uniquely, single men – to get the help they need. Official homelessness figures for England showed that in the fourth quarter of 2024, 27% of council decisions about whether they had a duty to help produced a refusal on the grounds that the person was not in ‘priority need’. That’s 7,200 people turned away in 92 days, the equivalent of one person every 18 minutes.
To the person, priority need can mean the ineffable trauma of having to sleep rough with all the danger and uncertainty that entails, not to mention feeling alone and locked out of support. To governments it has become a barrier to ending rough sleeping. It doesn’t have to be like this.