Opinion

We won’t keep 1.5 alive unless we make room for everyone at the table

Without better representation from women and the Global South, climate negotiations are hugely skewed towards certain interests, writes Anna Johnston from the Women's Budget Group

International leaders signed a joint statement at COP26 to advance the inclusion of women and girls in addressing climate change. A panel discussion included (l-r) Prime Minister of Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina, Prime Minister of Estonia Kaja Kallas, President of Tanzania Samia Suluhu Hassan and Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. Image: Scottish government/Flickr

COP26 is over, the intense spotlight on the climate emergency is dimming and we are still far behind the degree of commitment and action so urgently needed. As one of the wealthiest nations in the world, the UK has a huge and pressing responsibility to take radical action to limit temperature warming to 1.5 degrees. Yet, this is unlikely to happen if those most impacted are not represented in decision-making.

As we’ve seen with the Covid-19 pandemic, without the interests of those most negatively impacted being given a voice, large moments of national and global change are open to exploitation and capture by big business and private interests.

The eventual COP26 agreements saw oil and gas given little mention, and commitment to phase out coal being watered down at the last minute. This is no surprise given that the largest overall delegation was the Fossil Fuel industry itself,  with 503 delegates connected to the industry. Clearly, money and power buy you a voice. Add this to the already widely derided ‘family photo’ in which just a handful of world leaders were women, and the woeful lack of representation from the Global South we are left with a decision-making body hugely skewed towards certain interests.

Representation and participation matter. Decision-makers often end up approving policies that meet the needs of people like them, often to the exclusion of meeting the needs of others. The lack of diverse representation at COP26 is part of a systemic problem of what and who is seen as valuable within the global economy and what isn’t.

Yet there are reasons for optimism. Despite the COP proceedings proving insufficient, there were many far more ambitious solutions being discussed elsewhere. The Green Zone was open to the public as well as local and grassroots groups, activists and organisers, providing fertile ground for sharing reasoned and practical pathways to inclusive and socially just system change. Fringe events raised the voices of minoritised women and migrants in the UK and women from the Global South, and the epic – if drizzly – march on the Global Day of Action highlighted the commitment of people around the UK and the world to hold leaders accountable. There is energy, enthusiasm and crucially- solutions at all levels to implement social and feminist climate justice, but it will take better representation of those most impacted at the decision-making level if we are going to shift the government towards meaningful, inclusive action.

This is also the case for the UK’s net-zero strategy. We must rapidly decarbonise and reorient the economy towards low-carbon industries. Yet without explicitly addressing and mitigating against current inequalities, a decarbonised UK society will be just as unequal and unjust as it currently is; with unequal access to housing, childcare, transport, jobs, education and ultimately a good quality of life. The business-oriented, financial and tech-heavy solutions being bandied around by Boris Johnson and others will solve some problems but seen as the sole solutions will not help those most in need.

A lack of diverse representation in the UK’s climate policy planning means that little attention is paid to the impact of climate change on women and marginalised groups, particularly those already experiencing intersecting inequalities, or to female-dominated sectors like care that are already low-carbon.

There is also huge public support for making the care sectors a central part of UK net-zero strategies. Almost two-thirds (65 per cent) of the public support the creation of low-carbon jobs through investment in social infrastructure, such as childcare and social care according to polling by the Women’s Budget Group and NEON. Yet this has been so far neglected by the government. 

Government investment in social infrastructure would provide care jobs that offer good training, working conditions and pay. This would mean care work would finally be treated as a valued profession, and a suitable career choice for people who are currently in high-carbon jobs, encouraging them to retrain and move into this sector.

If women were represented and heard in climate decision-making, we might have an opportunity to tackle the care and climate crises in tandem. Whether deflated or energised following COP26, there is much work to be done and the time for action is now.

Anna Johnston is a research and policy officer at the Women’s Budget Group

Support the Big Issue

For over 30 years, the Big Issue has been committed to ending poverty in the UK. In 2024, our work is needed more than ever. Find out how you can support the Big Issue today.
Vendor martin Hawes

Recommended for you

View all
When it comes to poverty prevention it's minds we must change – before anything else
John Bird

When it comes to poverty prevention it's minds we must change – before anything else

We have no long-term housing plan. Here's why the Church of England is stepping up to fix it
Bishop for housing Dr Guli Francis-Dehqani says it will take more than political leaders to end England's housing crisis, including the housing sector, the royals and the Church. Image: Church of England
Dr Guli Francis-Dehqani

We have no long-term housing plan. Here's why the Church of England is stepping up to fix it

Alex Sobel MP: 'We need a serious, long-term and science-led plan to tackle climate emergency'
Alex Sobel MP
Earth Day

Alex Sobel MP: 'We need a serious, long-term and science-led plan to tackle climate emergency'

No one wants to host 2026 Commonwealth Games. What if Glasgow had another go? 
Paul McNamee

No one wants to host 2026 Commonwealth Games. What if Glasgow had another go? 

Most Popular

Read All
Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits
Renters: A mortgage lender's window advertising buy-to-let products
1.

Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal
Pound coins on a piece of paper with disability living allowancve
2.

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over
next dwp cost of living payment 2023
3.

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know
4.

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know