Advertisement - Content continues below
Radio

John Finnemore’s Souvenir Programme might just be a work of radio genius

As the final episode of the mind-bending tragi-comedy sketch show airs, Jonn Elledge speaks to its creator about the genesis of a show born of limitations

It feels strange to begin a piece about a sketch show with a spoiler warning. But half the fun of the ninth series of John Finnemore’s Souvenir Programme, which concluded on Radio 4 on Thursday, has been trying to work out how the various pieces of the story – a family saga, covering seven generations and 122 years, and mostly told in reverse – fit together. As a result, much of the social media chatter in the run up to the last episode has been concerned with minor mysteries – who, for example, the kindly Uncle Newt is if, as he maintains, he is only pretending to be an uncle.

So, for the record: this piece contains spoilers. If you’ve not listened, but are planning to, save this article until you’re good and ready. Or read on. But don’t say I didn’t warn you.

By way of spoiler space, we’ll answer one of the less profound questions  that the series has thrown up: why, when this is a show in which every sketch took place in a real location at a specific time, can the Yorkshire village of Spetwith not be found on Google maps?

It all, Finnemore explains, comes down to vowels: “Yorkshire accents are so minutely specific – even more so in 1939 – that I knew if I picked any particular village, a procession of Yorkshiremen would appear, on Twitter and quite possibly in my street, to tell me that, ’Folk never sound their Us like that in Allerton Mauleverer: that’s a Nidderdale U, is that’.” An imaginary village was simply less hassle.

After writing for shows including That Mitchell and Webb Sound, John Finnemore first made a name for himself writing and starring in Cabin Pressure, the airline-set radio sitcom which still, just about, counts as his masterwork. Since then, he’s written two seasons of Double Acts, a series of two-hander comic plays, and has written every line of the nine seasons of his sketch show Souvenir Programme.

Support The Big Issue and our vendors bysigning up for a subscription

Advertisement - Content continues below
Advertisement - Content continues below

This season, with its real places and ongoing stories and mysteries left hanging until the end, has been quite a departure for the show. Past seasons have tended towards the consciously, joyously silly: sketches in which a frog breaks it to his tadpoles that they’re not adopted, say, or which explore how the peasant gathering winter fuuuu-elll really felt when King Wenceslas showed up. (When one character this season says their work focuses on “animals and kings”, Finnemore is clearly writing about himself.)

Arguably, in fact, this season has been a departure for the entire notion of sketch comedy. With its punchlines and explanations deferred, sometimes for weeks; in the way characters unknowingly find themselves mirroring the actions of their ancestors, decades before; and in its sudden, unexpected gut-punches when scenes turn out not to be about bellylaughs but bereavements, it’s functioned much more like a novel. Told backwards. In a sketch show. 

All this, Finnemore says, was dictated by “one decision forced on us by the pandemic”: the lack of a studio audience.

“We’d done eight years performing on stage at the Radio Theatre in front of a room full of real people who really laugh,” he explains. Virtual audiences, watching via Zoom, might work for stand up comedy or panel shows, but they felt wrong for his more whimsical sketches. “If you did it and nobody laughed it would feel rather hollow.”

So that pointed to a change in format: “Characterful, fairly real scenes that you can enjoy without hearing an audience laugh to tell you they know it’s funny”. The idea of following different generations of a family was inspired, of all things, by the opening lines of Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina: “All happy families are alike, but every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way”. “I’ve always thought, that’s rubbish isn’t it?” Finnemore says. “The happy families I know, that more or less work and love each other, all get by in extremely different ways.”

That’s one reason why more than one of the nuclear family units the show gives us involve children being raised by same-sex couples. Another was simple logistics. “I have a cast of five, three men and two women” (Finnemore himself, plus Simon Kane, Lawry Lewin, Carrie Quinlan and Margaret Caborn-Smith). “In order to change things up it’s quite useful if you have same gender partnerships.”

The logistics of a small-cast were not as limiting as you might imagine. In some scenes, Cabourn-Smith plays both mother and daughter, and has to argue with herself, half the time with a German accent. “It would have been very easy just to record it twice and edit it together, but she said she preferred to be able to react off the lines and do it in real time,” Finnemore says. “She had a whole angry conversation with herself! It’s just astonishing.” (He’s equally effusive about the rest of the cast, but we’re short on space.)

I just start from the idea which is almost always bound up with the character, and explore outwards from that until I find a story with an endingJohn Finnemore

John Finnemore

The strangest element of the series – the fact it runs backwards – was dictated by the limitations of the format, too. The show, Finnemore notes, is a “6.30 comedy slot and fairly long established jolly family friendly sketch show. I felt sort of duty bound that this should be uplifting, and that these people are all more or less happy.” Running the story in reverse allowed the story to feature “some of the tragedies and the reversals of life, without which it’d be impossible to tell five life stories, but without it being a comedy drama”.

It’s that, though, which gives the story much of its power. The reverse narrative means that we can see baffling family traditions and bits of family lore in action before we discover their origin, and scenes that seemed like one thing early on are recontextualised by what we learn later. Newt’s poems, which seen through the eyes of his family seem like simple whimsy, turn out to be part of the war effort. In a scene from episode 1, set in 1990, we see him at a wake, entertaining a five year old. It’s five episodes later and 75 years in the past before we learn that, unknown to the rest of the family, he had just buried his daughter.

The same determination to let character and story lead also applied to Cabin Pressure. He originally intended the show’s cast to be structured like that of Father Ted, with two leads and two supporting roles. Then it cast Stephanie Cole as one of the latter – and “if you’ve got Stephanie Cole in your sitcom, you don’t just get her to do walk on.” So she became part of the core cast, and Finnemore found himself re-writing episode 4 to flesh out her backstory.

The relationship between the two original leads of Cabin Pressure – Roger Allam’s Douglas, and Martin, played by the (initially pre-superstardom) Benedict Cumberbatch – and the fact the wrong one was ostensibly in charge had been designed as the engine of the show. But that, too, changed on contact with the story. “I did lots of research, watched even more sitcoms than I normally would, to work out what format would keep giving me stories,” Finnemore says. “And then I sabotaged it. I allowed them to understand one another.” He’d precision engineered the perfect sitcom partnership – and then he accidentally turned them into people.

But I suspect it’s this urge, to write his characters so they’re more than just ciphers, that’s led to Finnemore’s popularity. The fact he works on radio, not TV, means he is, shamefully, not a household name. But those who love his work tend to really love it.

Finnemore denies worrying about anything as pretentious as themes. “I’m sure that there are things which other people would identify that I would agree or disagree with, but there is no burning thing which I am always keen to explore. I just start from the idea which is almost always bound up with the character, and explore outwards from that until I find a story with an ending.”

I’ve been in danger, for much of this article, of accusing a radio sketch show of saying something profound about mortality, parenthood and the tree of life.  I stand by this, because it definitely does. And if by some accident, you have read this far without listening, you should listen to it right now.

Well, since you ask me where you can hear season 9 of John Finnemore’s Souvenir Programme, written by John Finnemore and produced by Ed Morrish: it’s available on BBC Sounds now.

Advertisement - Content continues below

Support us today

Over the last 30 years, your contributions have been vital in providing opportunities for those facing poverty by giving them a hand up, not a hand out. Support us to help thousands more. Buy a copy from your local vendor, donate or subscribe online today.

Recommended for you

Read All
Anti-vaxxers, the Jewish Conspiracy and 6.5 children
Radio

Anti-vaxxers, the Jewish Conspiracy and 6.5 children

Taboo: Comedy hasn't lost its edge yet
Radio

Taboo: Comedy hasn't lost its edge yet

Joanna Neary and John Hegley: More of these original voices, please
Radio

Joanna Neary and John Hegley: More of these original voices, please

Kathy Burke on money, wealth and all of life's fineries
Radio

Kathy Burke on money, wealth and all of life's fineries

Most Popular

Read All
'What kidnappers do' - DWP forcing universal credit claimants to pose for photo with daily paper
1.

'What kidnappers do' - DWP forcing universal credit claimants to pose for photo with daily paper

The problems with BT's £50m 888 app to protect women on their way home
2.

The problems with BT's £50m 888 app to protect women on their way home

Why England's rivers are so polluted and will be for years to come
3.

Why England's rivers are so polluted and will be for years to come

Universal credit: What is it and why does the £20 cut matter?
4.

Universal credit: What is it and why does the £20 cut matter?