The two-child benefits limit will push one million already disadvantaged children further below the poverty line by 2023, experts have said two years after the policy was introduced.
A report by the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) and the Church of England showed that it has also pushed some women to consider abortions to make sure they could feed their families.
The policy restricts the child element in Universal Credit and tax credits, worth £2,780 per year for working families, to the first two children (excluding third or subsequent children born before April 2017).
Research that drew on contributions from Women’s Aid, the Refugee Council and Turn2Us demonstrated that the two-child limit disproportionately impacts working families. Parents reported being forced to cut back on fresh food for their children, accruing debt as they couldn’t cover utility bills and having to withdraw older children from activities like swimming lessons and school trips.
However analysis proved that for most families it would be impossible to compensate for the financial loss as a result of the policy by working more hours. A couple who have three children, one under two, who incur travel and childcare costs, and have one partner working full time for the National Living Wage (NLW) and one partner not working in order to care for the youngest child, would have to have the non-working partner take on a job of 31 hours per week to make up the loss.
The Big Issue magazine is a social enterprise, a business that reinvests its profits in helping others who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, or whose lives are blighted by poverty.
Meanwhile a single parent of three working 16 hours for the NLW while incurring travel and childcare costs wouldn’t even cover the financial loss if they were to increase their hours to 50 per week.
Of 430 families surveyed, 88 per cent said the two-child limit had made it difficult for them to afford food.
Lisa, who has four children and a husband in full-time work, said: “I don’t buy foods that I would like to buy, just food that’s close to nothing. I would have liked to get them fruit. I can’t remember the last time I made a fresh dinner, it’s all stuff I’ve got in my freezer.”
Ministers previously said child tax credit reforms would teach parents that “children cost money”.
The policy is hitting refugee families hard too, who largely arrive in the UK with nothing. It not only makes it difficult for parents to provide the basics for their children as they rebuild their lives but limits refugee children’s access to activities that could help them integrate and build social connections in their communities.
One couple told the Refugee Council: “We just try to pay the bills and buy food because that’s all we can afford, that’s what we have to prioritise.”
The family got rid of their TV to cut costs and, since having their youngest child, had to withdraw their eldest son from the football club he used to go to every Saturday.
CPAG chief executive Alison Garnham said: “Here in the UK, we believe that every child should have the best start in life. This means access to free health care, a good education, and a childhood free from poverty.
Important report published today by @CPAGUK on the impact of the two-child limit to benefit support. Politics has moved on from austerity, but the impact of this policy will grow over coming years and will be a highly visible example of ongoing austerity for low-income families. https://t.co/GldaqV4fNo
— ResolutionFoundation (@resfoundation) June 26, 2019
“We wouldn’t turn away a sick child from our hospitals or stop them going to school and yet the two-child limit denies families the support they need from our social security system when they experience tough times, trapping kids in poverty.
“We need to help children thrive, by supporting parents to raise happy, healthy children – especially during the first years of a child’s life, when foundations are laid for their future development. It’s right to support families when they need it most. Our government should lift the two-child limit and help all children to thrive.”
Interviews carried out by Women’s Aid suggested the policy traps women and their children in abusive relationships by increasing the financial risk of leaving. One survivor of domestic abuse said she felt forced to return to her abuser because the third child she was carrying wouldn’t be eligible for a child allowance.
And under the two-child limit, a woman who becomes pregnant due to rape is required to tell authorities that the conception was non-consensual in order to get an exception.
The Big Issue is a multi award-winning magazine, edited by the British Society of Magazine Editors (BSME) current Editor of the Year.
The report was published as more than fifty organisations – including the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Trussell Trust, Royal College of Paediatrics and British Pregnancy Advisory Service – launched a joint campaign to abolish the policy for good.
Margaret Greenwood, Labour’s shadow work and pensions secretary, said: “The government must listen to the damning evidence in this report. It brings home the impact of this cruel policy on families forced to cut back on essentials and pushed into poverty as a result.
“The two-child limit means children missing out not just on toys or school trips, but meals and new clothes when they need them. It sends a message that one child matters more than another simply because of the order in which they are born.”