Should people use AI for financial advice? Should Andy Burnham challenge Donald Trump? Big Issue readers have written in to share their thoughts on these questions raised by articles in the magazine and online.
Trumped up
The housing piece says Burnham’s agenda may put him at odds with Trump. We may have different perspectives on social policy but, quite frankly, it’s none of the US’s business how we run our internal affairs. Trump and his coterie have tried to push their agendas onto us for the last two years while objecting to the labour activists who helped Kamala Harris in her election campaign. We should do what that Danish MP did about Greenland: tell them to F off!
The remark about Trump’s advisers “flooding the zone with shit” reminds me of Hannah Arendt’s warning that if you deliberately tell enough lies, people no longer know what to believe and end up believing nothing, which makes them easy to rule. It’s part of the far-right agenda.
Nigel Sharpe, Fareham
Take the heat off
First, issue 1728 is great! Second, Sam Delaney and I must’ve been separated at birth. I agreed with and laughed out loud at his railing against this scary weather. My advice is to buy a pet cooling pad and shove it under your bottom sheet. Bliss. Also use your bath, washing, veg water for your garden. Plants aren’t bothered what they drink. Keep it all going.
Love, Mads
Man vs machine
Mr MoneyJar omits a critical difference between a human financial adviser and AI. While the human is bound by confidentiality rules and has a duty to give you best advice, no such constraint applies to AI systems. When you use them, they feel personal, supportive, and discreet. As a result this can lead you to reveal all kinds of financial details about yourself. As the saying goes, “if it’s free, then you are the product” and the very psychological process that led you to tell it things you might not even discuss with a friend, now open you up to exploitation by Big Tech.