News

Fact/Fiction: Does vaping make you more likely to spread Covid?

Old news, truthfully retold. Media reports suggest vaping can increase the spread of Covid, but are the claims puffed up?

Media reports suggest vaping can increase the spread of Covid, but are the claims puffed up?

Media reports suggest vaping can increase the spread of Covid, but are the claims puffed up? Illustration: Miles Cole

Every week in Fact/Fiction, The Big Issue examines spurious claims, questionable studies or debatable stories from the press to determine whether they are fact or fiction. This week we focus on dubious reports linking vaping to the spread of Covid-19. It was picked up by the likes of The Telegraph and MailOnline, but is it true? We investigate.

How it was told

It’s the invisible enemy confining us to our homes and away from loved ones.

From thorough hand washing to the importance of ventilation, for nearly a year we’ve been inundated with information about how droplets carrying Covid-19 spread.

But should vaping have been on that list all along? Anyone who has walked down a high street will be familiar with being engulfed by a sickly sweet fog from a nearby pedestrian.

Even sticking to a two-metre distance there’s little chance of avoiding an oncoming blueberry cloud exhaled by someone walking ahead of you.

That’s why headlines this week sparked fears that vapers in public were putting others at risk. Reports warned that Covid-positive people using vapes and breathing out lots of smoke were nearly a fifth more likely to pass it on, they said.

Mail Online ran with the headline: “Vapers up to 17% more likely to spread coronavirus because it gets blown around when they breathe out, study says”.

Meanwhile The Daily Telegraph upped the ante, alerting readers that “Vapers with Covid-19 up to 20 per cent more likely to transmit it than infected non-smoker”.

We should certainly all be doing our best to limit our risk to others. But are the reports a real cause for concern or just a bit of hot air?

Facts. Checked

Not really. In this case, it’s panic that is being spread.

The study behind the news reports, led by scientists in Mexico, New Zealand and Italy, examined how much air people breathe when vaping more than they examined the spread of Covid-19. They found that vapers will exhale one per cent more air than non-smokers, on average – measured as between 10 and 15 puffs an hour.

That rises to five to 17 per cent more air exhaled at “high intensity”. But that’s in comparison to someone who is not talking, coughing, sneezing, singing, or participating in any other “expiratory activities”, according to the report.

And it’s still less than half the risk posed by talking – keen chatters breathe out 44 per cent more air if they speak for six minutes in an hour, the study showed.

Coughing, despite being more intermittent than talking, is nearly as risky because of the large number of droplets spread.

One could argue that someone puffing on a vape is automatically more likely to pass on the virus by virtue of being without a mask.

But even the report points out that “masks are seldom worn in home-bound scenarios of family clusters”, in other words, most vapers will be in environments where masks wouldn’t be worn anyway. The researchers didn’t actually study infection rates linked to vapour, instead making assumptions based on their knowledge of how droplets spread.

They emphasise this in the report. Their advice? Keep a two-metre distance just like you would from anyone else and wear a mask where appropriate.

You’re more likely to dodge the coronavirus by steering clear of someone who is talking than someone inhaling an e-cigarette.

But if vapers are more conscious of avoiding innocent passers-by when they exhale, then that surely can’t be a bad thing.

Support the Big Issue

For over 30 years, the Big Issue has been committed to ending poverty in the UK. In 2024, our work is needed more than ever. Find out how you can support the Big Issue today.
Vendor martin Hawes

Recommended for you

View all
Why the general election could and should be fought on the frontier of poverty
Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner on the first day of the general election campaign
General election 2024

Why the general election could and should be fought on the frontier of poverty

Beat the Streets music festival funds new homes for rough sleepers: 'If we could do more, we would'
Homelessness

Beat the Streets music festival funds new homes for rough sleepers: 'If we could do more, we would'

'Nature is slowly healing': How rewilding is bringing Britain's extinct species back from the dead
Conservation

'Nature is slowly healing': How rewilding is bringing Britain's extinct species back from the dead

From the NHS to levelling up: Here are all the broken promises after 14 years of Tory rule
General Election 2024

From the NHS to levelling up: Here are all the broken promises after 14 years of Tory rule

Most Popular

Read All
Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits
Renters: A mortgage lender's window advertising buy-to-let products
1.

Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal
Pound coins on a piece of paper with disability living allowancve
2.

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over
next dwp cost of living payment 2023
3.

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know
4.

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know