Rishi Sunak's North Sea oil bonanza is laying the foundation for a culture war election

As Rishi Sunak posed for an awkwardly choreographed photo-op in Margaret Thatcher’s old car this week, it became clear that the next election will be fought on an American-style culture-war platform of targeted nostalgia and straw men. The announcement of new oil and gas licences just a fortnight after the world experienced its hottest week on record is all part of the game.

With little else left in the tank and the polls looking bleak, Sunak and his political advisers have decided that their best chance of avoiding electoral meltdown is to set up a false dichotomy between jobs, cars and petro-freedom on the one hand, and an imagined unholy alliance of Labour and radical green activists on the other. The tragedy is that Sunak has another set of advisers at his disposal who are world experts in climate change, yet he seems unable and unwilling to listen to them on the most serious issue of all.

UK prime ministers have a habit of visiting Scotland’s oil heartlands when it is expedient for them to do so. David Cameron was the first PM to visit Shetland in 34 years when he jetted in to talk about the islands’ special place in the UK during the 2014 independence referendum. Margaret Thatcher herself had travelled to Shetland the year after she took office to visit its huge oil terminal at Sullom Voe, and today Rishi Sunak was in Aberdeen to do similar.

Sunak may be intent on tapping into the ideals and aesthetics of high Thatcherism, but it is no longer 1990. The globe now kicks out almost double the amount of carbon each year as it did when Thatcher left office and the UN was beginning to assemble leading global scientists to monitor climate change. The numbers for further oil extraction simply do not add up, and another record summer shows that climate change is not something we can export and forget about. Rosebank – the huge new oil field west of Shetland the UK government wants to open up – is in an area that this year has suffered a marine heatwave pushing ocean temperatures to unprecedented highs. The idea Britain is somehow safe from the impacts of climate change is demonstrably untrue.

Oil has indeed been good to some parts of Scotland and has compensated for a lack of investment from London and Edinburgh, but six decades of extraction have not left the country as a whole in good shape. Throughout the 1980s, the tax receipts from North Sea oil helped to pay for rising unemployment rather than being ploughed back into northern Britain’s quickly deindustrialising cities, tipping the UK as a whole towards an overreliance on the City of London, finance and the service sector.

One of the ironies of the Rosebank project is that it is run by Equinor, Norway’s state oil company. The UK will take a portion of profits in tax, but the rest will end up paying for Norwegian hospitals and public services rather than Scottish and British ones. In Aberdeen, nominally the biggest beneficiary of the UK oil and gas industry, the council has been closing libraries and slashing public services whilst energy companies make record profits.

For the past few years I have been travelling around Scotland’s oil and gas sites trying to understand what a future after fossil fuels looks like, talking not to politicians and investors but people who work and live in the communities. They see well enough what is going on, and they don’t just want pay packets but futures for their families and public services for their communities. 

The press operation Sunak undertook on his Aberdeen visit tried to make his new drilling licenses look like savvy business for Global Britain and a concrete commitment to oil and gas workers, but many of these people have been burned before by the promises of energy companies and industry downturns. There may be no way to correct the mistakes of the 1980s and give Scotland the oil wealth it lost, but people can at least avoid making the same mistake twice.

Accelerating renewables development and dealing with the underlying inequalities of Britain’s north-south divide is likely a better strategy for levelling up and economic progress than further tax breaks for oil and gas companies. Sunak wants the public to believe he is bravely taking on a mob of socialists, greens and anti-capitalists, but the truth is that he has picked a fight with scientific and economic reality. He is a man looking to salvage some kind of legacy, but if this is to be it then history will not judge him kindly.

Dominic Hinde is a journalist specialising in climate change and a lecturer in sociology at the University of Glasgow.

Do you have a story to tell or opinions to share about this? We want to hear from you. Get in touch and tell us more.