Opinion

UK migration is at a record high – but immigration should be celebrated, not weaponised 

Experience tells us that there will be those who try and “weaponise” immigration no matter what. There will always be 'record highs', as well as 'record lows'. This is not where the focus should be

migration museum

London's Migration Museum helps tell the story of how immigration made us who we are. Image: Elzbieta Piekacz/Migration Museum

Not for the first time we have the same talk of “record high immigration” when the latest statistics are released, yet statistics alone rarely give a full picture.

Immigration statistics in particular are problematic. They tend to show how many people are staying in the UK for a certain period, but not what that person is doing, or what the impact really is. Most importantly they do not really show why someone has come to the UK. We can say someone is here on a work visa, or a student visa, but we cannot say from looking at the statistics what made them choose the UK over all the other countries in the world to work or study in. 

Where statistics become especially problematic is in how they are used to shape anti-immigration arguments, which increase hostility not only to migrants, but also minorities. You cannot tell if someone is a migrant just by looking at them, but we see plenty of people try. We have already seen, in particular in relation to those seeking asylum, how misused, or misunderstood, statistics, are spun by some as an argument for denying human rights to whole groups. The rhetoric surrounding “small boats” for example. Channel crossings make up fewer than half of asylum applications in general, but almost 100% of political talking points. They have been used to push for policies, such as the recently ruled unlawful plan to send people to Rwanda, and some are even trying to use them to limit who can be protected by universal human rights. 

Part of the way this is done is by creating a “fear” around the long-term impact of immigration. You cannot reliably use immigration data to predict long-term trends though. People move for a multitude of reasons, mostly personal. Trying to use data from today to predict a trend 10, 20, 50 years down the line is impossible, there are too many unknowns and variables. You can make rough guesses, but that is all they really are, just guesses. This scaremongering though plays into the hands of those who want to prevent people coming to the UK. It still does not tell the whole story though. 

Change a Big Issue vendor’s life this Christmas by purchasing a Winter Support Kit. You’ll receive four copies of the magazine and create a brighter future for our vendors through Christmas and beyond.

Immigration statistics do not, on their own, show how international students help ensure the ongoing viability of the higher education sector for everyone. They do not show how the links built through people moving from one country to another help strengthen international relations, and thereby can benefit trade, security, and information sharing, among other things. They ignore that no matter where someone comes from they still need to live. That means buying food, clothes, renting a home, paying bills, working etc, all of which contribute to the country, and economy, as a whole. There is a term in economics called the “lump of labour fallacy”. It is the assumption that there is only a fixed number of jobs in any given economy. There is a very simple reason it is called a fallacy though, because it is so obviously wrong. It would mean that new jobs would never be created. Every migrant who comes to the UK is helping to create jobs, just by the very nature of living here. 

We hear a lot of talk about how we need to look at immigration statistics to plan for infrastructure. We rarely hear in those arguments how migrants work in the very sectors which help to create and run that infrastructure. For all the posturing about encouraging more people in the UK to fill vacancies, the reality is that it is more complex, and it requires immigration.  

Experience tells us that there will be those who try and “weaponise” immigration no matter what. There will always be “record highs”, as well as “record lows”. This is not where the focus should be though. There are plenty of countries around the world which provide good jobs and good education, we should be celebrating that people choose the UK. Immigration should be seen as competitive, in terms of trying to attract people. The constant attention to statistics, and calling for more “controls”, is more likely to put people off coming to the UK though, which weakens the country as a whole.  

Immigration is about more than statistics; it is about more than jobs. Immigration is, in its simplest terms, about people. There is a reason why areas with higher levels of immigration have, statistically speaking, lower levels of anti-immigration views. Migrants are our colleagues, our friends, our families. They are part of our communities, and, as we all do, contribute in ways which are often hard to quantify, but important nonetheless. Those bonds, those contributions, go far beyond numbers on a spreadsheet. 

Daniel Sohege is the director of human rights advocacy group Stand for All

Support the Big Issue

For over 30 years, the Big Issue has been committed to ending poverty in the UK. In 2024, our work is needed more than ever. Find out how you can support the Big Issue today.
Vendor martin Hawes

Recommended for you

View all
I know how to make the DWP better and get more people into work – but they're just not listening
dwp/ mel stride
John McDonough

I know how to make the DWP better and get more people into work – but they're just not listening

DWP has the power to help people. Why is it choosing to threaten disabled people instead?
dwp
Sumi Rabindrakumar

DWP has the power to help people. Why is it choosing to threaten disabled people instead?

Voyager 1's galactic mixtape, extending a hand of welcome to the universe 
Paul McNamee

Voyager 1's galactic mixtape, extending a hand of welcome to the universe 

Has the two-child benefit cap put 'fairness' before children's best interests?
Louise Bazalgette

Has the two-child benefit cap put 'fairness' before children's best interests?

Most Popular

Read All
Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits
Renters: A mortgage lender's window advertising buy-to-let products
1.

Renters pay their landlords' buy-to-let mortgages, so they should get a share of the profits

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal
Pound coins on a piece of paper with disability living allowancve
2.

Exclusive: Disabled people are 'set up to fail' by the DWP in target-driven disability benefits system, whistleblowers reveal

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over
next dwp cost of living payment 2023
3.

Cost of living payment 2024: Where to get help now the scheme is over

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know
4.

Strike dates 2023: From train drivers to NHS doctors, here are the dates to know