Environmental campaigners have warned the move to make fuel cheaper will incentivise diesel and petrol car use at a time when the government should be encouraging uptake of electric vehicles and greener forms of travel to reduce carbon emissions.
“The fundamental issue [with the fuel duty cut] is that it doesn’t treat a symptom of a much bigger disease, which is our dependence on fossil fuels”, Murray said.
Subscribe to The Big Issue
Take a print or digital subscription to The Big Issue and provide a critical lifeline to our work.
“The bizzare thing about this is that it’s a subsidy to oil companies already enjoying record profit. Ultimately that public money is going into the pockets of oil companiesand Putin, who supplies a fifth of the UK’s diesel,” he added.
Campaigners have also said that a cut in fuel duty is an inefficient way to tackle the cost of living crisis, given the poorest drive less and own fewer – or no – cars when compared to wealthier groups.
Analysis from the New Economics Foundation shows that only seven per cent of savings from the cut will go to the poorest fifth of households, while a third will go to the richest.
Break the cycle of poverty for good
Big Futures is calling on the Government to put in place a plan and policies to break this cycle of poverty for good. We are calling for long-term solutions to meet the biggest issues faced in the UK today – the housing crisis, low wages and the climate crisis. Dealing with these issues will help the UK to protect the environmental, social, economic and cultural wellbeing of future generations. So that young people and future generations have a fair shot at life. Join us and demand a better future.
Paul Tuohy, chief executive at the Campaign for Better Transport (CBT) said: “A cut in fuel duty will only serve as a temporary respite for richer drivers and do little to help those on the lowest incomes who may not even own a car.”
According to the CBT, rail fares have risen at a higher rate than fuel costs since 2012, while bus fares have increased 54 per cent over the last decade. If fuel had risen at the same rate, it would cost “well over 200p a litre by now instead of an average of 167p”, the CBT said.
Campaigners say measures to tackle the cost of living crisis should be more targeted and address the climate emergency, rather than exacerbate it.
The Green Alliance suggests a windfall tax on oil companies, a campaign to reduce energy waste and “supercharging” rollout of renewable energy could help mitigate both the cost of living crisis and climate emergency.
Murray, meanwhile, said slashing the cost of public transport – as New Zealand has done – could help the poorest through the cost of living crisis, while the government should also work on rolling out more measures to reduce dependency on fossil fuels.
“Cutting fuel duty is a knee-jerk reaction that makes it harder to stop an energy crisis from happening again and sets us back in the fight against climate change.”